Warning: Use of undefined constant GFCI_MEMBER_WIDGET - assumed 'GFCI_MEMBER_WIDGET' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/google-friend-connect-integration/gfcintegration.php on line 26

Warning: Use of undefined constant GFCI_LOGIN_WIDGET - assumed 'GFCI_LOGIN_WIDGET' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/google-friend-connect-integration/gfcintegration.php on line 27

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/themes/suffusion/functions/media.php on line 666

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/themes/suffusion/functions/media.php on line 671

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/themes/suffusion/functions/media.php on line 684

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/themes/suffusion/functions/media.php on line 689

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/46/d106109878/htdocs/wp-content/themes/suffusion/functions/media.php on line 694
dignity Archives - Kang vs. Kodos
Jun 192009
 

Libertarians take as axiomatic that every person has a natural right to be secure in his life, liberty, and property. Necessary to respect and protect these rights is the non-agression principle, which states that all interpersonal exchanges must be voluntary and coercion is immoral. Briefly, to take one’s life is to take one’s future, to take one’s liberty is to take one’s present, and to take one’s property (the product of one’s life and liberty) is to take the part of one’s past that produced or acquired that property. A lengthier explanation can be found in the “Philosophy of Liberty”.

This ethos is good so far as it goes, and I find it far more appealing than the interventionism (imperialistic paternalism abroad and socialist paternalism at home) I see taking over American government, but I’ve never been able to shake the feeling that it’s missing something. Libertarianism seems to me to be vulnerable to accusations of being the philosophy of the selfish. While objectivists might not object to such an accusation, I suspect most other libertarians would. Collectivists of various stripes argue that man, self-centered and self-serving as he is, cannot be trusted to adhere to non-aggression for very long without a least a little – and perhaps a great deal of – governance.

Continue reading »