Charitable Interpretation
Selective Memory
Sep 02
I anxiously await PittGirl's witty retort to this…um…art.
Comment
Name
EmailNot published
Website
Note: This post is over 5 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.
I think the artwork is great sarcasm.
I’m not sure if it was intended as such, but the inanity of the obsession with TomCat’s child deserves something like this.
And, of course, there are precedents.
Any solipsistic art is by its nature more akin to crap than art, and most modern art because it does not reach beyond the human toward the divine is solipsistic therefore it is crap. This is only modern art being honest.
19 week-old infant?! 19 WEEKS?!?!! The child’s first “bowel movement”. Ha! They mean the child’s first bowel movement suitable for sculpting.
I think the artwork is great sarcasm.
I’m not sure if it was intended as such, but the inanity of the obsession with TomCat’s child deserves something like this.
And, of course, there are precedents.
Any solipsistic art is by its nature more akin to crap than art, and most modern art because it does not reach beyond the human toward the divine is solipsistic therefore it is crap. This is only modern art being honest.
19 week-old infant?! 19 WEEKS?!?!! The child’s first “bowel movement”. Ha! They mean the child’s first bowel movement suitable for sculpting.